El mae M
3 min readApr 2, 2023

--

Yes, but they were originally Africans. They lost their melanin and the top protective layer of their skin. While on average I agree with you that a large majority of them have a partially calcified pineal gland. It’s not all of them. Genetics are sometimes expressed but not always. I believe environment plays a huge role in gene expression. I personally believe your viewpoint makes sense for blue eyed Europeans. Since they all come from one common ancestor.

But I often focus on the fact that many people classified as “white” also have somewhat close African ancestry. Such as the white people whose parents told them they were all “part Cherokee” and that’s why they can “tan”. But I know very well that any white person who can tan still has melanin left in their genes.

In all honesty I don’t know what to say about blue eyed, red heads and blondes who cannot tan but just burn. While this is a very large number of Anglo Saxons and Irish people. It does not however always extend to Swedish Europeans or Italian Europeans who are known for their ability to tan.

The problem is that people who are classified as white now are a mixture of “White” and “Non white” genes even though they don’t know or understand this. I happen to know that most straight haired white people are descended from albino South Indians and most curly haired white people are descended from African albinos. Though I obviously do not actually believe the fake racial categories they have invented South Indians are literally Africans with straight hair. It is also why brown patches of melanin still remain on their faces known as freckles. For instance a redhead who is covered in freckles could actually be said to be brown skinned but with patches of white skin showing through their melanin.

I’m sorry for this long response but I believe the issues you brought up can only be applied to a rare number of white people with blue eyes, no melanin in the hair, who are unable to tan and only burn. But that’s only if somehow the inability to produce melanin at all actually is linked to some brain abnormalities. I would be willing to look into that. I myself am biracial which means I do not walk around with a full amount of melanin all the time. I have however been able to always get so dark in the sun I think my melanin is working just fine. I do sunburn (which is very strange I’ve come to realize) but then this morphs into a very dark golden brown color within a day or two. Idk how souless I am compared to a South Indian man or a Latina women or even a darker skinned black person. Is the fact that I am able to turn so dark brown what’s saving me from being a sociopath in this life? I know I say things that sound absurd but I genuinely mean them. I genuinely am curious and I wish people would stop pretending that blue eyes and blonde hair is just a natural human condition. All of these people have severe albinism. It is possible that affects their chemical balances. I myself have inherited slight amounts of albinism because my skin is not full dark brown/ black like the original humans.

--

--

El mae M
El mae M

Written by El mae M

Human Rights.Social Theory. Hermeticism. Ancient History. Literature. Biracial -Transracial- Adoptee

No responses yet